HF01-06: Racist Museums and the Didusch
Friday, May 3, 2024 2:25 PM to 2:32 PM · 7 min. (US/Central)
206
Abstract
History of Urology Forum
Information
Full Abstract and Figures
Author Block
Christian Creighton*, Michael E Moran, Columbia, SC
Introduction
It is hard to believe that colonialism, books, and racism are related in any way to the modern practice of urology, let alone the William P. Didusch Center for Urologic History. However, disparities of culture as well as changing social responses make close encounters with museums, their purpose and messages susceptible to critique. By delving into the annals of urological history, we aim to shed light on the impact of these societal factors on the presentation and portrayal of urological topics over time.
Methods
Our research is grounded in an extensive review of the Didusch Center’s collections of historical pamphlets, meeting records, and annual topics. We were specifically interested in the displays within the museum and exhibits available since 1971. By examining these artifacts, we seek to discern any references to minorities, minority representation and racism within the presentations and research presented, and its evolution through the years.
Results
Patel and his colleagues presented the history of the Forum last year, but the Didusch was longstanding prior to this, and historical topics of presentation had a long and interesting history at the Annual Meetings of the AUA going back to the 1950s. Our findings reveal a compelling history of urological presentations at the Didusch including displays of instruments, urologic procedures and specialization that are carefully crafted and avoid race and equity. Our review shows only one presentation on race in 2012 “Skeletons in the Closet.”
Conclusions
In the broader context, this paper underscores the ongoing efforts of urology programs across the United States to embrace inclusiveness and promote the recognition of shared human suffering within the realms of healthcare and urology. It emphasizes the essential truth that all of humanity shares the burden of urological ailments equally, and that a collaborative commitment to inclusivity is the path forward. Furthermore, this research contributes to a deeper comprehension of the profound interconnectedness between cultural disparities, social responses, and the messaging inherent to museums and their overarching purpose.
Source Of Funding
None
Author Block
Christian Creighton*, Michael E Moran, Columbia, SC
Introduction
It is hard to believe that colonialism, books, and racism are related in any way to the modern practice of urology, let alone the William P. Didusch Center for Urologic History. However, disparities of culture as well as changing social responses make close encounters with museums, their purpose and messages susceptible to critique. By delving into the annals of urological history, we aim to shed light on the impact of these societal factors on the presentation and portrayal of urological topics over time.
Methods
Our research is grounded in an extensive review of the Didusch Center’s collections of historical pamphlets, meeting records, and annual topics. We were specifically interested in the displays within the museum and exhibits available since 1971. By examining these artifacts, we seek to discern any references to minorities, minority representation and racism within the presentations and research presented, and its evolution through the years.
Results
Patel and his colleagues presented the history of the Forum last year, but the Didusch was longstanding prior to this, and historical topics of presentation had a long and interesting history at the Annual Meetings of the AUA going back to the 1950s. Our findings reveal a compelling history of urological presentations at the Didusch including displays of instruments, urologic procedures and specialization that are carefully crafted and avoid race and equity. Our review shows only one presentation on race in 2012 “Skeletons in the Closet.”
Conclusions
In the broader context, this paper underscores the ongoing efforts of urology programs across the United States to embrace inclusiveness and promote the recognition of shared human suffering within the realms of healthcare and urology. It emphasizes the essential truth that all of humanity shares the burden of urological ailments equally, and that a collaborative commitment to inclusivity is the path forward. Furthermore, this research contributes to a deeper comprehension of the profound interconnectedness between cultural disparities, social responses, and the messaging inherent to museums and their overarching purpose.
Source Of Funding
None
Sessions
History of Urology Forum
206